Spin doctors and reputation mongers

» Gallimaufry

How is it that domestic politics in this country is at once so rancid and so banal, so embittered and yet so uninspiring? Why should it be that two parties with few if any essential differences are ready to speak of each other as if a cultural or even a civil war were only a few speeches away? Obviously, much of this fatuous rhetoric arises from the need to disagree more and more about less and less, to maintain the mills of fundraising in a churning condition, and to keep the dwindling groups of genuine loyalists and activists in a state of excited pseudo-commitment. But much of the dankness and dinginess is owed to the influence exerted by professional political operators, those who have a careerist interest in "the process" as it is—which is to say partisan in theory and bipartisan in practice.

Christopher Hitchens in The Atlantic: Thinking Like an Apparatchik

Your feelings?

Please share your feelings about Spin doctors and reputation mongers. Please stick to the topic of the entry. Forthright disagreement is fine as long as it is civil.
My thanks,
Richard

Gay Pop Culture

Comments

Other Entries

JT's 
Stockroom

Bookmark Pansexual Sodomite


Pansexual Sodomite
Index
Gallimaufry
Spin doctors and reputation mongers
Top of page